Secure source code review, traced to the exact line.

MAYASEVEN reads your code the way an attacker would — white-box, with full source access — and traces every vulnerability to the exact line before it ships. Our own AI agent sweeps the entire codebase at machine speed; our experts verify each finding and prove real impact. Your source never leaves our private network.

SCOPE

What Source Code Review covers

Full-repository SAST coverage

Our agent parses every file, follows data flow from source to sink, and flags injection, deserialization, SSRF, path traversal and unsafe crypto candidates across the whole repository — coverage no manual pass reaches in the same time-box.

Business-logic and authorization flaws

The work no scanner can do: experts trace privilege boundaries, multi-step workflows and trust assumptions to find broken access control, IDOR and logic abuse that only a human reading intent against implementation will see.

OWASP, CWE and dependency analysis

Findings mapped to OWASP Top 10 and CWE, with review of authentication, session handling, secrets management and third-party libraries — including vulnerable and outdated components pulled in through your supply chain.

Verified findings with line-level proof

Every issue arrives human-verified with the exact file and line, CVSS score, a working proof-of-concept where exploitable, business impact and concrete remediation — signed off by a named expert, not a model.

Secure-by-design and SDLC fit

We review against the way you build and ship, and recommend fixes and guardrails that hold in CI — catching classes of flaws early, where remediation is cheapest, not after release.

THE AUGMENTED METHOD

How human + AI work together here

Source code review is where the augmented model earns its keep. A large codebase is too much ground for any human to read line by line inside a sensible time-box, and a scanner run alone buries you in false positives and misses the flaws that matter. So our own, on-premise AI agent reads everything first — tracing data flow, enumerating sink-reachable paths and drafting candidate findings across the full repository at machine speed. Then our experts take over: they discard the noise, confirm what is genuinely exploitable, and chain the business-logic and authorization flaws no tool understands. The agent gives coverage; the human gives judgment, exploitation and accountability. Because we built our own local LLM and review agent, your source code, secrets and findings stay inside infrastructure we own and certify — nothing is sent to a third-party model API.

FAQ

Source Code Review — frequently asked

What is the difference between source code review and a penetration test?

A penetration test attacks the running application from the outside and proves what an external attacker can reach. A source code review is white-box: we read the source directly, so we can trace a vulnerability to the exact line and find flaws that are invisible from outside — dangerous code paths, weak crypto, hardcoded secrets and subtle logic errors. Many clients run both: the review catches issues before code ships, the pentest validates the deployed system. The two are complementary, not interchangeable.

What languages do you cover and what do you need from us to start?

We review across common stacks including Java, C#/.NET, Go, Python, PHP, JavaScript/TypeScript and Node, plus mobile (Kotlin, Swift). To start we need read access to the repository, a short architecture overview, the build and dependency manifests, and a note on the components you consider most sensitive — authentication, payments, anything touching crown-jewel data. The more context on intended behaviour, the sharper our business-logic findings. We can work from a tagged commit or a release branch.

How long does a source code review take?

It depends on size, language and the depth you need, typically one to three weeks of focused work for a single application. Codebase size, the number of trust boundaries and how much business-logic analysis is in scope are the main drivers. We scope every engagement up front, agree the targets and depth with you, and give a firm timeline before any work starts.

What standards do you map findings to, and what does the report contain?

Findings are mapped to OWASP Top 10 and CWE, scored with CVSS, and where relevant referenced against MITRE ATT&CK for post-exploitation impact. The report gives each issue at the exact file and line, a working proof-of-concept where exploitable, business impact and prioritized remediation, plus an executive summary for leadership. Every finding is human-verified and signed off by a named expert. MAYASEVEN is ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and ISO 9001:2015 certified, and your source is reviewed entirely inside our private on-premise network — it is never sent to a third-party model API.

Ready to scope your Source Code Review?

Talk to MAYASEVEN to scope the work and get a quote — a lead expert replies within one business day.